Rune 2h vs. Rune Baxe

[bloodz max]

i've only ever f2p pked twice in my life, so i have no clue what delaying is or anything.

Example i hit with r scim once hit a 25 the guy has around 15 hp.....he eats he is 30 hp you take your 2h and when u take it it comes out quicker then taking is out when you with scim its like this you hit with scim a couple of seconds later hit with 2h....that's delaying for you...

[f e a re d]

i voted r2h but thats only because i havent really tried the baxe.

[at0mic skill]

baxe with range/melee

2h with scim/2h (melee only) :unsure2:

[Physical]

Rune 2h > Rune B axe

[Smited B O W]

2h, faster and you can always take 26k and pro item

[Itz]

i like baxe and i hit 30s with it

[d72]

I'd rather use the baxe in f2p.

It's a fraction of the price, it's faster, and it only hits like 1-2 less for me.

Also, it helps when it's one handed.

[Nick.]

^^ what he said.

[Cholesterol]

I'd rather use the baxe in f2p.

It's a fraction of the price, it's faster, and it only hits like 1-2 less for me.

Also, it helps when it's one handed.

Yeah you can stick a wooden sheild on aswell, peasant style

[Robyn| lnch]

2h, faster and you can always take 26k and pro item

Faster? Nope.

You can always take the battle axe and not protect item in f2p. *gasps*

[madly hybrid]

rune 2h

[Chad]

Rune baxe lots cheaper, and faster to hit but I prefer 2h personally.

[Zany]

Since range to 2h combo got nerfed ive preferred battle axe. waay more swiftly to use, u can time it so u can hit twice and other eats once, instead of 2h they eat twice for sure.

battle axe is also waay better for multi. and half the price doesnt hurt either (:

[Itz Tragic]

wow, this topic has actually helped me alot, gonna try using msb to rune scimy to rune baxe next time i pk, usually i would use a 2h, lots of feedback here :)

[Vlooieneuker]

baxe is little less delay after you hit (hits faster) than 2h but 2h has a higher max hit.

i prefer 2h in 1v1 but in multi i sometimes take baxe or warhammer for lolz :x

[`Stef]

r2h = win

[Spark bladez]

Definitly 2h more accurate, higher hits, higher ko precentage.

Becides it looks sexy :]

r2h ftw! :lol:

[Loco]

2h, faster and you can always take 26k and pro item

Errr, baxe is faster than a r2h and you can always not protect item?

[Ow 3 Hit]

I hate f2p pk'ing in general, but R2H is better.

[mr d stroy]

2h, more accurate, and stronger

[Y4nk33 D33s]

2h, stronger but less accurate

[Vlooieneuker]

2h, stronger but less accurate

2h has more attack bonus i think  :unsure2: makes it more accurate

not sure VS platearmour. its possible that baxe has more offensive crush bonus then r2h but it wouldn't be easy to switch weapon+attack style during a fight without the risk of getting controlled/def xp.

[Zany]

rofl at the noobs saying random crap like battleaxe being more accurate xD

Most important factors here: Strength & Speed. its about preferences really, and how skilled you are switching & timing eating/hitting

[Nick.]

Zany is right about the accuracy myth. There is hardly a difference - its just luck lol.

You're more likely to remember when u get a lucky ko with either weapon

[Ok Dds Ok]

corrupt DBA is win.